Homepage Blank Navy Evaluation Form
Outline

The Navy Evaluation form, officially known as the Evaluation Report & Counseling Record (E1 - E6), serves as a critical tool for assessing the performance and potential of enlisted personnel. This comprehensive document captures essential information, including the service member's name, rate, and social security number, along with details about their duty station and promotion status. It outlines the occasion for the report, whether it’s periodic, for promotion, or a special evaluation. Performance traits are evaluated on a scale from 1.0 to 5.0, allowing reporting seniors to provide clear feedback on various aspects such as professional knowledge, quality of work, leadership, teamwork, and military bearing. The form also includes sections for mid-term counseling, qualifications, and achievements, ensuring a holistic view of the individual’s contributions and areas for improvement. The evaluation process emphasizes the importance of mentorship and professional development, encouraging leaders to actively support the growth of their subordinates. Additionally, the form mandates that any low marks must be substantiated with specific comments, reinforcing accountability in the evaluation process. Understanding the nuances of this form is vital for both evaluators and those being evaluated, as it directly impacts career progression and opportunities within the Navy.

Sample - Navy Evaluation Form

EVALUATION REPORT & COUNSELING RECORD (E1 - E6)

 

Save Form

RCS BUPERS 1610-1

Clear Form

1. Name

(Last, First MI Suffix)

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Rate

 

 

3.

Desig

4.

SSN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.

 

ACT

 

FTS

INACT

AT/ADSW/265

6. UIC

7. Ship/Station

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8. Promotion Status

 

9. Date Reported

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Occasion for Report

 

 

 

 

Detachment

 

Promotion /

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Period of Report

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.

Periodic

 

 

11.

of Individual

 

12. Frocking

 

 

 

 

13. Special

 

 

14.

From:

15.

To:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.

Not Observed

 

 

 

Type of Report

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20.

Physical Readiness

21.

Billet Subcategory (if any)

 

Report

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17. Regular

 

 

18. Concurrent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22.

Reporting Senior

(Last, FI

MI)

23. Grade

24. Desig

25. Title

 

 

 

26. UIC

27.

SSN

28.Command employment and command achievements

29.Primary/Collateral/Watchstanding duties. (Enter Primary duty abbreviation in box.)

For Mid-term Counseling Use. (When completing EVAL Enter 30 and 31 from counseling worksheet sign 32.)

30. Date Counseled

31. Counselor

32.Signature of Individual Counseled

 

PERFORMANCE TRAITS: 1.0 – Below standards / not progressing or UNSAT in any one standard; 2.0 – Does not yet meet all 3.0 standards;

3.0 – Meets all 3.0

 

standards; 4.0 – Exceeds most 3.0 standards; 5.0 – Meets overall criteria and most of the specific standards for 5.0. Standards are not all inclusive.

 

PERFORMANCE

1.0*

 

 

2.0

 

3.0

 

 

4.0

 

5.0

 

 

 

 

 

Pro-

 

 

Above

 

 

 

TRAITS

Below Standards

Meets Standards

Greatly Exceeds Standards

 

gressing

Standards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33.

 

 

 

 

- Marginal knowledge of rating, specialty

 

 

 

- Strong working knowledge of rating, specialty

 

 

 

- Recognized expert, sought out by all for

 

PROFESSIONAL

or job.

 

 

 

and job.

 

 

 

technical knowledge.

 

KNOWLEDGE:

- Unable to apply knowledge to solve

 

 

 

- Reliably applies knowledge to

 

 

 

- Uses knowledge to solve complex

 

Technical knowledge

routine problems.

 

 

 

accomplish tasks.

 

 

 

technical problems.

 

- Fails to meet advancement/PQS

 

 

 

- Meets advancement/PQS requirements on time.

 

 

 

- Meets advancement/PQS requirements

 

and practical application.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

requirements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

early/with distinction.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34.

 

 

 

 

- Needs excessive supervision.

 

 

 

- Needs little supervision.

 

 

 

- Needs no supervision.

 

QUALITY OF WORK:

- Product frequently needs rework.

 

 

 

- Produces quality work.

 

 

 

- Always produces exceptional work.

 

Standard of work;

- Wasteful of resources.

 

 

 

Few errors and resulting rework.

 

 

 

No rework required.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Uses resources efficiently.

 

 

 

- Maximizes resources.

 

value of end product.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35.

 

 

 

 

- Actions counter to Navy's retention/

 

 

 

- Positive leadership supports Navy's increased

 

 

 

- Measurably contributes to Navy's increased

 

COMMAND OR

reenlistment goals.

 

 

 

retention goals. Active in decreasing attrition.

 

 

 

retention and reduced attrition objectives.

 

ORGANIZATIONAL

- Uninvolved with mentoring or

 

 

 

- Actions adequately encourage/support

 

 

 

- Proactive leader/exemplary mentor.

 

CLIMATE/EQUAL

professional development of subordinates.

 

 

 

subordinates' personal/professional growth.

 

 

 

Involved in subordinates' personal

 

OPPORTUNITY:

- Actions counter to good order and

 

 

 

- Demonstrates appreciation for contributions of

 

 

 

development leading to professional growth/

 

Contributing to growth

discipline and negatively affect Command/

 

 

 

Navy personnel. Positive influence on

 

 

 

sustained commitment.

 

and development,

Organizational climate.

 

 

 

Command climate.

 

 

 

- Initiates support programs for military,

 

human worth,

- Demonstrates exclusionary behavior.

 

 

 

- Values differences as strengths.

 

 

 

civilian, and families to achieve exceptional

 

community.

Fails to value differences from

 

 

 

Fosters atmosphere of acceptance/

 

 

 

Command and Organizational climate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

cultural diversity.

 

 

 

inclusion per EO/EEO policy.

 

 

 

- The model of achievement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Develops unit cohesion by valuing differences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

as strengths.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36.

 

 

 

 

- Consistently unsatisfactory appearance.

 

 

 

- Excellent personal appearance.

 

 

 

- Exemplary personal appearance.

 

MILITARY BEARING/ - Poor self-control; conduct resulting in

 

 

 

- Excellent conduct, conscientiously complies

 

 

 

- Model of conduct, on and off duty.

 

CHARACTER:

disciplinary action.

 

 

 

with regulations.

 

 

 

- A leader in physical readiness.

 

Appearance, conduct,

- Unable to meet one or more

 

 

 

- Complies with physical readiness program.

 

 

 

- Exemplifies Navy Core Values:

 

physical fitness,

physical readiness standards.

 

 

 

- Always lives up to Navy Core Values:

 

 

 

HONOR, COURAGE, COMMITMENT.

 

adherence to

- Fails to live up to one or more

 

 

 

HONOR, COURAGE, COMMITMENT.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Navy Core Values.

Navy Core Values:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HONOR, COURAGE, COMMITMENT.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37.

 

 

 

 

- Needs prodding to attain qualification or

 

 

 

- Productive and motivated.

 

 

 

- Energetic self-starter. Completes tasks or

 

PERSONAL JOB

finish job.

 

 

 

Completes tasks and qualifications fully and

 

 

 

qualifications early, far better than expected.

 

ACCOMPLISHMENT/

- Prioritizes poorly.

 

 

 

on time.

 

 

 

- Plans/prioritizes wisely and with

 

INITIATIVE:

- Avoids responsibility.

 

 

 

- Plans/prioritizes effectively.

 

 

 

exceptional foresight.

 

Responsibility,

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Reliable, dependable,

 

 

 

- Seeks extra responsibility and takes on the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

willingly accepts responsibility.

 

 

 

hardest jobs.

 

quantity of work.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOB

NAVPERS 1616/26 (08-10)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY-PRIVACY ACT SENSITIVE.

EVALUATION REPORT & COUNSELING RECORD (E1 - E6 ) (cont'd) RCS BUPERS 1610-1

1. Name (Last, First MI Suffix)

2. Rate

3. Desig

4. SSN

PERFORMANCE

 

1.0*

 

 

2.0

 

3.0

 

 

 

4.0

 

5.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pro-

 

 

 

Above

 

 

 

TRAITS

 

Below Standards

Meets Standards

Greatly Exceeds Standards

 

 

 

 

gressing

Standards

 

 

 

38.

 

 

- Creates conflict,

 

 

 

- Reinforces others' efforts,

 

 

 

- Team builder,

 

 

 

TEAMWORK:

unwilling to work with others,

 

 

 

meets commitments to team.

 

 

 

inspires cooperation and progress.

 

 

 

Contributions to

puts self above team.

 

 

 

- Understands goals,

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Focuses goals and techniques for teams.

- Fails to understand team goals or

 

 

 

employs good teamwork techniques.

 

 

 

- The best at accepting and offering

 

 

 

team building and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

teamwork techniques.

 

 

 

- Accepts and offers team direction.

 

 

 

team direction.

 

 

 

team results.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Does not take direction well.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39.

 

 

- Neglects growth/development or welfare

 

 

 

- Effectively stimulates growth/development in

 

 

 

- Inspiring motivator and trainer, subordinates

LEADERSHIP:

of subordinates.

 

 

 

subordinates.

 

 

 

 

 

 

reach highest level of growth and development.

Organizing, motivating

- Fails to organize, creates problems

 

 

 

- Organizes successfully, implementing

 

 

 

- Superb organizer, great foresight, develops

for subordinates.

 

 

 

process improvements and efficiencies.

 

 

 

process improvements and efficiencies.

and developing others

- Does not set or achieve goals relevant to

 

 

 

- Sets/achieves useful, realistic goals

 

 

 

- Leadership achievements dramatically further

to accomplish goals.

command mission and vision.

 

 

 

that support command mission.

 

 

 

command mission and vision.

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Lacks ability to cope with or

 

 

 

- Performs well in stressful situations.

 

 

 

- Perseveres through the toughest challenges

 

 

 

tolerate stress.

 

 

 

- Clear, timely communicator.

 

 

 

and inspires others.

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Inadequate communicator.

 

 

 

- Ensures safety of personnel and equipment.

 

 

 

- Exceptional communicator.

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Tolerates hazards or unsafe practices.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Makes subordinates safety-conscious,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

maintains top safety record.

 

 

 

NOB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Constantly improves the personal and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

professional lives of others.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40. Individual Trait Average.

 

41. I recommend this individual for (maximum of two): Assignment in Rating,

42. Signature of Rater (Typed Name & Rate): I have evaluated this member against

Total of trait scores divided by

Sea Special Programs, Shore Special Programs, Commissioning Programs,

the above performance standards and have forwarded written explanation of marks

number of graded traits.

 

Special Warfare Programs, Rating Instructor Duty, Other. (Be specific.)

of 1.0 and 5.0.

 

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43. COMMENTS ON PERFORMANCE. *All 1.0 marks, three 2.0 marks, and 2.0 marks in Block 37 must be specifically substantiated in comments. Comments must be verifiable.

Font

Font must be 10 or 12 pitch (10 to 12 point) only. Use upper and lower case.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

44. QUALIFICATIONS/ACHIEVEMENTS - Education, awards, community involvement, etc., during this period.

Promotion

 

NOB

Significant

Progressing

 

Promotable

 

Must

 

Early

47. Retention :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recommendation

 

Problems

 

 

Promote

 

Promote

Not Recommended

 

 

Recommended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

48. Reporting Senior Address

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INDIVIDUAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

49. Signature of Senior Rater (Typed Name & Grade/Rate): I have reviewed the evaluation of this

50.

Signature of Reporting Senior

 

Date:

member against these performance standards and have provided written explanation to support

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

marks of 1.0 and 5.0.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary Group Average:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51. Signature of individual evaluated. “I have seen this report, been apprised of my

 

52. Typed name, grade, command, UIC, and signature of Regular Reporting Senior on Concurrent Report

performance, and understand my right to make a statement.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I intend to submit a statement

 

 

 

do not intend to submit a statement

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAVPERS 1616/26 (08-10)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY-PRIVACY ACT SENSITIVE.

Form Information

Fact Name Description
Form Purpose The Navy Evaluation Report & Counseling Record (E1 - E6) is used to assess the performance and potential of enlisted personnel in the Navy.
Rating Scale The evaluation uses a rating scale from 1.0 to 5.0, where 1.0 indicates below standards and 5.0 signifies exceeding standards.
Performance Traits Performance traits include various categories such as professional knowledge, quality of work, military bearing, and teamwork, among others.
Counseling Requirement Mid-term counseling is mandatory, and the counselor must document the date and sign the evaluation form.
Privacy Act Compliance This form is sensitive and subject to the Privacy Act, requiring careful handling of personal information.

Detailed Guide for Filling Out Navy Evaluation

Completing the Navy Evaluation form is an essential process for documenting an individual's performance and achievements. This form serves as a formal record, which can significantly impact career progression and opportunities. Below are the steps to effectively fill out the Navy Evaluation form.

  1. Begin by entering the individual’s Name in the format of Last, First, Middle Initial, and Suffix.
  2. Fill in the Rate of the individual.
  3. Provide the Designator (Desig) associated with the individual.
  4. Enter the Social Security Number (SSN).
  5. Select the appropriate status: Active, Full-Time Support (FTS), Inactive, Active Duty Special Work (ADSW), or 265.
  6. Input the Unit Identification Code (UIC).
  7. Specify the Ship/Station where the individual is assigned.
  8. Indicate the Promotion Status of the individual.
  9. Complete the Date Reported section and specify the Occasion for Report, such as Detachment, Promotion, or Period of Report.
  10. Mark the type of report as Periodic, Frocking, or Special.
  11. Fill in the Period of Individual Evaluation by entering the From and To dates.
  12. Check the box for Not Observed if applicable.
  13. Document the Physical Readiness Report and any Billet Subcategory if applicable.
  14. Provide the Reporting Senior's information, including Last Name, First Initial, Middle Initial, Grade, Designator, Title, UIC, and SSN.
  15. Summarize the individual's command employment and achievements, as well as their primary, collateral, and watchstanding duties.
  16. For mid-term counseling, enter the Date Counseled, the Counselor's name, and the Signature of Individual Counseled.
  17. Evaluate the individual using the Performance Traits scale from 1.0 to 5.0, providing comments to substantiate any low or high marks.
  18. Calculate the Individual Trait Average based on the total of trait scores divided by the number of graded traits.
  19. Indicate recommendations for the individual, such as assignments in specific programs.
  20. Complete the Comments on Performance section, ensuring all marks are substantiated.
  21. Document any Qualifications/Achievements during the evaluation period.
  22. Provide the Reporting Senior's Address.
  23. Secure the signatures of the Senior Rater, the Reporting Senior, and the individual evaluated, along with their respective dates.

After completing these steps, ensure all sections are filled out accurately. Review the form for any errors or omissions before submission. This careful attention to detail will contribute to a fair and comprehensive evaluation process.

Obtain Answers on Navy Evaluation

  1. What is the purpose of the Navy Evaluation form?

    The Navy Evaluation form, officially known as the Evaluation Report & Counseling Record (E1 - E6), serves to document and assess the performance and potential of enlisted personnel. It provides a structured way for leaders to evaluate their subordinates on various performance traits, ensuring that evaluations are consistent and fair. This form is crucial for promotion considerations, assignments, and overall career development within the Navy.

  2. What information is required on the form?

    The form requires several key pieces of information, including:

    • Name (Last, First MI Suffix)
    • Rate and Designation
    • Social Security Number (SSN)
    • Unit Identification Code (UIC)
    • Promotion Status
    • Period of Report (From and To dates)
    • Performance Traits ratings

    Completing these sections accurately is essential for the evaluation process.

  3. How are performance traits rated?

    Performance traits are rated on a scale from 1.0 to 5.0. Each rating corresponds to specific performance levels:

    • 1.0 - Below standards
    • 2.0 - Does not yet meet all standards
    • 3.0 - Meets all standards
    • 4.0 - Exceeds most standards
    • 5.0 - Greatly exceeds standards

    These ratings help provide a clear picture of an individual's performance and areas for improvement.

  4. What should be included in the comments on performance section?

    The comments section is an opportunity to provide specific feedback about the individual's performance. It should include verifiable examples that support the ratings given. If there are any ratings of 1.0 or 2.0, these must be substantiated with clear explanations. This helps ensure transparency and fairness in the evaluation process.

  5. What is the significance of the signatures on the form?

    Signatures on the Navy Evaluation form indicate that the evaluation has been reviewed and acknowledged by both the rater and the reporting senior. The individual being evaluated also signs to confirm they have seen the report and understand their right to make a statement regarding the evaluation. This process adds a layer of accountability and ensures that all parties are aware of the evaluation's content.

  6. What happens if an individual disagrees with their evaluation?

    If an individual disagrees with their evaluation, they have the right to submit a statement. This statement can address any concerns or discrepancies they perceive in the evaluation. It is important to follow the appropriate channels and procedures for submitting such statements to ensure they are considered during the evaluation process.

Common mistakes

Filling out the Navy Evaluation form is a critical task that can significantly impact a service member's career. Unfortunately, several common mistakes can occur during this process. Understanding these errors can help ensure that evaluations are completed accurately and effectively.

One frequent mistake is failing to provide complete and accurate personal information. It is essential to include the correct name, rate, and Social Security number. Missing or incorrect details can lead to administrative issues and affect the evaluation's validity. Always double-check this information before submission.

Another common error involves neglecting to substantiate performance marks with specific comments. The evaluation requires that any marks of 1.0 and 5.0 be supported by verifiable comments. Without this justification, the evaluation may be deemed incomplete or lacking in credibility. It is crucial to provide clear examples of performance that align with the assigned marks.

Many evaluators also make the mistake of using vague language in their assessments. General statements do not provide the necessary clarity or insight into an individual’s performance. Instead, it is advisable to use precise language that accurately reflects the service member's contributions and achievements.

Inadequate attention to the evaluation's formatting can also lead to issues. The form specifies that the font must be 10 or 12 pitch, and using incorrect formatting may result in the evaluation being returned for correction. Adhering to these guidelines is vital for maintaining professionalism.

Another mistake is overlooking the importance of the counseling section. Failing to document mid-term counseling can hinder a service member's ability to improve and grow. This section provides an opportunity for constructive feedback, and neglecting it can limit future development.

Lastly, some individuals may forget to sign the evaluation form. Signatures are necessary to validate the report and confirm that all parties involved have reviewed the content. Omitting a signature can delay the evaluation process and lead to administrative complications.

By being aware of these common mistakes, service members can take proactive steps to ensure their evaluations are completed accurately and effectively. Attention to detail in this process not only reflects professionalism but also plays a crucial role in career advancement.

Documents used along the form

The Navy Evaluation form is a crucial document used to assess the performance of personnel in the Navy. Along with this form, several other documents are often utilized to provide a comprehensive view of a service member's performance, achievements, and potential. Below is a list of these documents, each with a brief description.

  • Mid-Term Counseling Worksheet: This document is used to provide feedback to service members during the evaluation period. It outlines performance expectations and allows for discussions on areas needing improvement.
  • Fitness Report: This report evaluates a service member's physical fitness and readiness. It includes information on physical training, attendance, and overall health status, which are essential for operational effectiveness.
  • Personal Awards Recommendation: This document is submitted to recommend service members for awards or commendations based on their exceptional performance or achievements during a specific period.
  • Training and Qualifications Record: This record tracks the training and qualifications that a service member has completed. It is important for assessing readiness for specific duties or promotions.
  • Promotion Recommendation: This form is used to recommend service members for promotion based on their performance evaluations, leadership qualities, and potential for increased responsibility.

These documents work together to create a complete picture of a service member's contributions and readiness for future opportunities within the Navy. Properly completing and maintaining these records is essential for career progression and personal development.

Similar forms

  • Performance Appraisal Form: Similar to the Navy Evaluation form, a performance appraisal form assesses an employee's job performance over a specific period. It includes criteria such as quality of work, teamwork, and leadership, allowing supervisors to provide structured feedback.
  • Employee Evaluation Report: This document evaluates an employee's skills and contributions within an organization. Like the Navy Evaluation form, it often uses a rating scale to summarize performance and may include comments on areas for improvement.
  • Annual Review: An annual review summarizes an employee's performance throughout the year. It shares similarities with the Navy Evaluation form in that both documents highlight achievements, areas needing improvement, and future goals.
  • Self-Assessment Form: This form allows employees to evaluate their own performance. Similar to the Navy Evaluation form, it encourages reflection on strengths and weaknesses, fostering personal and professional development.
  • 360-Degree Feedback: This feedback tool collects input from various sources, including peers, subordinates, and supervisors. Like the Navy Evaluation form, it provides a comprehensive view of an individual's performance, emphasizing teamwork and leadership qualities.

Dos and Don'ts

When filling out the Navy Evaluation form, attention to detail and clarity are essential. Here are five important dos and don'ts to consider:

  • Do ensure that all personal information is accurate. Double-check names, rates, and other identifying details.
  • Do provide specific examples of achievements and contributions. This helps to paint a clear picture of performance.
  • Do use clear and concise language. Avoid overly complex phrases that may confuse the reader.
  • Do seek feedback from peers or supervisors before finalizing the evaluation. Fresh perspectives can enhance the quality of the report.
  • Do adhere to the formatting guidelines. Consistency in font size and style reflects professionalism.
  • Don't include vague statements. General comments can undermine the effectiveness of the evaluation.
  • Don't forget to proofread for grammatical errors. Mistakes can detract from the credibility of the report.
  • Don't exaggerate achievements. Honesty is crucial; inflated claims can lead to distrust.
  • Don't leave sections blank. Every part of the form should be completed to ensure a comprehensive evaluation.
  • Don't overlook the importance of signatures. Ensure that all required signatures are present before submission.

Misconceptions

  • Misconception 1: The Navy Evaluation form is only for high-ranking personnel.
  • This form is applicable to all personnel from E1 to E6. It serves as a performance evaluation tool for all ranks within that range.

  • Misconception 2: Evaluations are solely based on numerical scores.
  • While numerical scores are important, qualitative comments and justifications are crucial. They provide context and clarity to the evaluations.

  • Misconception 3: The evaluation process is only a formality.
  • The evaluation is a vital component of career progression and can significantly impact promotions and assignments. It is taken seriously by both evaluators and those being evaluated.

  • Misconception 4: Evaluators have complete discretion without any guidelines.
  • Evaluators must adhere to established performance standards. These standards provide a framework for fair and consistent evaluations.

  • Misconception 5: All evaluations are the same regardless of the reporting senior.
  • Each reporting senior brings their perspective and standards to the evaluation process. This can lead to variations in evaluations based on the individual's leadership style.

  • Misconception 6: You cannot challenge or dispute your evaluation.
  • Individuals have the right to submit a statement if they disagree with their evaluation. This ensures that all voices are heard in the process.

  • Misconception 7: The evaluation form is only about individual performance.
  • It also assesses contributions to team dynamics and organizational climate. Teamwork and leadership qualities are critical components of the evaluation.

  • Misconception 8: Poor evaluations cannot be improved upon.
  • Individuals can take constructive feedback from evaluations to enhance their performance. Setting goals and seeking mentorship can lead to better future evaluations.

  • Misconception 9: The evaluation process is quick and easy.
  • Completing a thorough evaluation requires time and careful consideration. Evaluators must assess multiple aspects of performance, which can be a detailed process.

Key takeaways

Filling out the Navy Evaluation form can be a crucial part of your career progression. Here are some key takeaways to keep in mind:

  • Accuracy is Essential: Ensure that all personal information, such as name, rate, and SSN, is accurate. Mistakes can lead to delays or complications in processing.
  • Understand Performance Traits: Familiarize yourself with the performance traits outlined in the form. Each trait is rated on a scale from 1.0 to 5.0, reflecting your level of performance.
  • Be Specific in Comments: When providing comments on performance, be specific and verifiable. This is especially important for any low scores, as they require substantiation.
  • Mid-term Counseling: Use the mid-term counseling section effectively. This can help set expectations and provide guidance for improvement before the final evaluation.
  • Highlight Achievements: Take the time to list any qualifications or achievements during the evaluation period. This can include education, awards, or community involvement.
  • Review Before Submission: Always review the completed evaluation form before submission. Ensure that it accurately reflects your performance and contributions.
  • Engage with Your Rater: Maintain open communication with your rater. Discuss your performance and seek feedback regularly to understand how you can improve.

By keeping these points in mind, you can navigate the evaluation process more effectively and enhance your chances of career advancement within the Navy.