Blank Da 2166 9 1 Form

1. What is the purpose of the DA 2166 9 1 form?

   The DA 2166 9 1 form is used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the rank of Sergeant (SGT). It serves to document performance and potential, providing a structured way for raters and senior raters to assess an NCO's contributions, competencies, and overall effectiveness in their role. This evaluation process is critical for personnel management and career progression within the Army.

2. Who is required to complete the DA 2166 9 1 form?

   The form must be completed by the rater, who is typically the NCO's immediate supervisor. The senior rater, who is usually a higher-ranking officer or NCO, also plays a role in the evaluation process. Additionally, the rated NCO must acknowledge the report by signing it, which indicates they have reviewed the information, even if they do not agree with the assessments.

3. What information is included in Part I of the form?

   Part I contains administrative data essential for identifying the rated NCO and contextualizing the evaluation. This includes:

   • Name (Last, First, Middle Initial)
   • Social Security Number or DOD ID Number
   • Rank and Date of Rank
   • Unit or Organization details
   • Reason for submission
   • Period covered by the evaluation

4. What does Part III of the form focus on?

   Part III is dedicated to the duty description of the rated NCO. This section outlines the principal duty title, the Military Occupational Specialty Code (MOSC), and daily duties. It may also highlight areas of special emphasis and any appointed duties. This information provides context for the evaluation and helps to clarify the NCO's responsibilities.

5. How is performance evaluated in Part IV?

   Part IV assesses various attributes and competencies of the rated NCO. It includes evaluations on:

   • Character
   • Presence
   • Intellect
   • Leadership
   • Development
   • Achievement

   Each area is rated as "Met" or "Did Not Meet Standard," and the rater provides comments to justify their evaluations. This structured feedback is crucial for the NCO's professional growth.

6. What is the significance of the senior rater's comments?

   The senior rater's comments in Part V are vital as they provide an overall assessment of the NCO's potential compared to peers. The senior rater selects a category ranging from "Most Qualified" to "Not Qualified." This evaluation can significantly impact the NCO's future assignments and career opportunities.

7. Are there any privacy concerns associated with the DA 2166 9 1 form?

   Yes, the form includes sensitive personal information, such as the rated NCO's Social Security Number. The Privacy Act Statement, as referenced in AR 623-3, outlines how this information will be used and protected. It is essential for all parties involved to handle the form with care to maintain confidentiality.

8. What should the rated NCO understand before signing the form?

   Before signing the DA 2166 9 1 form, the rated NCO should understand that their signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with the evaluations. Instead, it confirms that they have reviewed the administrative data, the duty description, and the counseling dates. Additionally, they should be aware of the appeals process as outlined in AR 623-3.

Filling out the DA Form 2166-9-1 is a critical task for NCOs, but many make mistakes that can lead to delays or issues in their evaluations. One common error is failing to provide accurate personal information. This includes the name, social security number, and rank. If any of this information is incorrect, it can cause significant complications down the line. Always double-check that your details match official records before submitting the form.

Another frequent mistake is neglecting to include the correct dates in the administrative data section. This includes the date of rank and the period covered by the evaluation. Missing or incorrect dates can create confusion regarding the evaluation period and may even impact your eligibility for promotions or assignments. It is crucial to ensure that all dates are filled out correctly and correspond to the relevant timeframes.

Many individuals also overlook the importance of the duty description section. This part should clearly outline daily duties, areas of special emphasis, and any appointed duties. Incomplete or vague descriptions can lead to misunderstandings about your responsibilities and performance. Take the time to provide a comprehensive overview of your role, as it plays a significant part in how you are evaluated.

Finally, a common oversight is failing to review the completed form before submission. It’s essential to ensure that all sections are filled out accurately and that signatures are provided where necessary. Missing signatures or incomplete sections can result in delays in processing your evaluation. Review the form thoroughly to confirm that everything is correct, as this step can save you time and frustration later.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential document used for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Alongside this form, several other documents are commonly utilized to ensure a comprehensive evaluation process. Below is a list of these forms, each serving a specific purpose in conjunction with the DA Form 2166-9-1.

• DA Form 4856: This is the Developmental Counseling Form. It is used by leaders to document counseling sessions with soldiers. The form captures the soldier's strengths and areas for improvement, ensuring that feedback is constructive and clear.
• DA Form 67-9: This is the Officer Evaluation Report (OER). Similar to the NCO evaluation, it is used for evaluating officers. It provides a structured format for reporting an officer's performance and potential, ensuring consistency across evaluations.
• DA Form 705: This form records the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) results. It includes details about the soldier's physical fitness performance, which is a critical component of overall evaluation and readiness.
• DA Form 5500/5501: These are the Body Fat Content Worksheets. They are used to assess a soldier's body fat percentage and ensure compliance with Army weight standards. Accurate records of body composition are vital for maintaining the physical readiness of soldiers.

Utilizing these forms alongside the DA Form 2166-9-1 allows for a thorough and fair evaluation process. Each document contributes to a holistic view of a soldier's performance, development, and adherence to Army standards.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an important document used in the evaluation of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) within the U.S. Army. Several other forms serve similar purposes in the context of personnel evaluation and administrative procedures. Here are four documents that share similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1:

• DA Form 67-9: This form is used for the Officer Evaluation Report (OER). Like the DA Form 2166-9-1, it provides a structured format for evaluating an individual's performance and potential within their role. Both forms require input from raters and senior raters, ensuring a comprehensive assessment.
• DA Form 1059: The Academic Evaluation Report (AER) utilizes this form to assess the performance of soldiers in military schools. Similar to the DA Form 2166-9-1, it focuses on individual performance, achievements, and areas for improvement, providing feedback that is essential for career development.
• DA Form 4856: This form is known as the Developmental Counseling Form. It is used for documenting counseling sessions between leaders and subordinates. Like the DA Form 2166-9-1, it emphasizes the importance of communication and feedback in an individual's professional growth and performance.
• DA Form 7000: This is the Request for Personnel Action form. It is utilized for various personnel actions, including evaluations and promotions. The DA Form 7000, like the DA Form 2166-9-1, plays a critical role in the personnel management process, ensuring that evaluations and recommendations are properly documented and acted upon.

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it is important to approach the task with care and attention to detail. Here are ten things you should and shouldn't do:

• Do ensure that all personal information is accurate and complete.
• Don't leave any required fields blank, as this can delay processing.
• Do use the correct format for dates (YYYYMMDD).
• Don't use nicknames or abbreviations for names; full legal names are necessary.
• Do verify that email addresses end in .gov or .mil.
• Don't forget to sign and date the form where indicated.
• Do review the completed form for any errors before submission.
• Don't submit the form without ensuring that all required attachments are included.
• Do keep a copy of the submitted form for your records.
• Don't ignore the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3; be aware of your rights.

There are several misconceptions about the DA 2166 9 1 form that can lead to confusion. Here are five common misunderstandings:

• Misconception 1: The DA 2166 9 1 form is only for negative evaluations.

This is not true. The form is used for both positive and negative evaluations. It reflects an NCO's overall performance, which can include commendable achievements as well as areas needing improvement.

• Misconception 2: Signing the form means agreement with the evaluation.

Many believe that signing the form indicates agreement with the ratings. In reality, the signature only verifies that the administrative data is correct and that the NCO has seen the completed report.

• Misconception 3: The evaluation is solely based on the rater’s opinion.

This is misleading. While the rater provides a significant input, the evaluation also considers feedback from the senior rater and may include supplementary reviewers.

• Misconception 4: There is no way to appeal an evaluation.

This is incorrect. The form includes a statement indicating that the NCO is aware of the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3. NCOs have the right to contest evaluations they believe are unfair.

• Misconception 5: The form is only relevant for promotions.

While the DA 2166 9 1 form is used in promotion considerations, it also plays a role in professional development and career progression. The evaluations help identify strengths and areas for growth.

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, which is the NCO Evaluation Report for Sergeants, is an important process that requires careful attention to detail. Here are some key takeaways to consider:

• Administrative Data is Crucial: Ensure that all administrative data, including the rated NCO’s name, SSN, rank, and unit information, is accurately filled out in Part I.
• Verification of Information: The rated NCO must sign to verify that the information provided in Part I is correct, even if they do not agree with the assessments.
• Rater and Senior Rater Details: Accurate information about the rater and senior rater, including their names, ranks, and email addresses, must be included in Part II.
• Performance Evaluation: In Part IV, the rater evaluates various competencies and attributes of the rated NCO. Each area should be addressed with specific comments to support the ratings.
• Counseling Dates Matter: The rated NCO should ensure that counseling dates are documented properly. This shows that they have received guidance and feedback throughout the evaluation period.
• Height and Weight Standards: Accurate reporting of height and weight is essential. Comments are required if the rated NCO fails to meet Army standards.
• Overall Potential Assessment: The senior rater must assess the rated NCO’s potential compared to others in the same grade. This assessment should be based on a thorough understanding of the NCO’s performance.
• Signatures are Required: All parties involved, including the rated NCO, rater, and senior rater, must sign the form to validate the evaluation process.
• Understand the Appeals Process: The rated NCO should be aware of the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3, which allows them to contest the evaluation if necessary.

By keeping these key points in mind, individuals can ensure that the DA 2166-9-1 form is completed accurately and effectively, reflecting the true performance and potential of the rated NCO.